Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (3b5cf3)

SITUATION Committee charter that does not define escalation arrived with two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file for AI committee secretariat. That is a AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability decision on the control plane actually in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using committee charter that does not define escalation after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Committee charter that does not define escalation reads as Policy or governance breach once two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Committee charter that does not define escalation is closer to Model defect after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in committee charter that does not define escalation for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 4. Committee charter that does not define escalation is missing the fact AI committee secretariat needs after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in committee charter that does not define escalation was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 3. Map the control-plane score in committee charter that does not define escalation to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read committee charter that does not define escalation against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (committee charter that does not define escalation after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on the control plane actually, then the evidence in committee charter that does not define escalation, then the action for AI committee secretariat - Hypothesis scorecard against committee charter that does not define escalation: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Lifecycle and Accountability would cite - Lifecycle and Accountability finding in committee charter that does not define escalation that a second reviewer can re-perform