Assess whether agents must have a human gate for external actions (37aa39)

Situation

Agents must have a human gate sits with AI committee secretariat because an agent that refunded customers above its limit hit a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. Evidence is decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step; write the AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability option that extract can carry.

Decision

AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after an agent that refunded customers above its limit.

Hypotheses to test

• AI committee secretariat can defend Policy or governance breach from decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after an agent that refunded customers above its limit in a AI Governance Layer challenge.
• AI committee secretariat cannot defend Policy or governance breach from decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after an agent that refunded customers above its limit.
• An agent that refunded customers above its limit never reached the population in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step — reopen intake, do not close agents must have a human gate.
• Two facts in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after an agent that refunded customers above its limit conflict for AI committee secretariat; hold this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

Analysis required

• Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce.
• Name the override that would let agents must have a human gate proceed without a silent bypass.
• Test whether an agent that refunded customers above its limit changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against an agent that refunded customers above its limit and write the one fact that would move agents must have a human gate for AI committee secretariat.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after an agent that refunded customers above its limit). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step can support after an agent that refunded customers above its limit, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.