Assess whether audits can reconstruct who authorized what (7552cb)

Situation

AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA has one working extract — output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output — after an agent that refunded customers above its limit. If output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output cannot support audits can reconstruct who, the honest AI Governance Layer output is hold.

Decision

AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after an agent that refunded customers above its limit.

Hypotheses to test

• Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output reads as Policy or governance breach once an agent that refunded customers above its limit is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population.
• Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is closer to Model defect after an agent that refunded customers above its limit; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Audit and Vendor Terms extract.
• Dual failure is still live in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output for AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA.
• Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is missing the fact AI committee secretariat needs after an agent that refunded customers above its limit; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

Analysis required

• Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce.
• Name the override that would let audits can reconstruct who proceed without a silent bypass.
• Test whether an agent that refunded customers above its limit changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against an agent that refunded customers above its limit and write the one fact that would move audits can reconstruct who for AI committee secretariat.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after an agent that refunded customers above its limit). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.