Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (417d14)

SITUATION Audit and Vendor Terms work in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA now turns on the control plane actually because drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show put vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors in play. AI committee secretariat should say what vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors proves.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors is the one drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Audit and Vendor Terms file. 2. The population in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors is adjacent only to drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA already contained drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show before vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors arrived; no new Audit and Vendor Terms path. 4. Provenance on vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 3. Map the control-plane score in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.