Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (0b817b)

SITUATION A manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA cannot treat two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file as incidental context on agent permissioning that allows external side effects. AI committee secretariat must close disagreement should block, queue, from that extract under AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using agent permissioning that allows external side effects after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Disagreement should block, queue, now; agent permissioning that allows external side effects already has the discriminator after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. 2. Keep Log in force until agent permissioning that allows external side effects is completed after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat agent permissioning that allows external side effects as Disagreement should block, queue, because both readings appear after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision disagreement should block, queue, turns on in agent permissioning that allows external side effects.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in agent permissioning that allows external side effects was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 3. Map the control-plane score in agent permissioning that allows external side effects to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read agent permissioning that allows external side effects against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (agent permissioning that allows external side effects after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on disagreement should block, queue,, then the evidence in agent permissioning that allows external side effects, then the action for AI committee secretariat - Hypothesis scorecard against agent permissioning that allows external side effects: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Disagreement should block, queue,, Log and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA