Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (91bc25)

SITUATION AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA has one working extract — agent permissioning that allows external side effects — after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. If agent permissioning that allows external side effects cannot support procurement should fail a, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Agent permissioning that allows external side effects reads as Policy or governance breach once a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Agent permissioning that allows external side effects is closer to Model defect after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Audit and Vendor Terms extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in agent permissioning that allows external side effects for AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 4. Agent permissioning that allows external side effects is missing the fact AI committee secretariat needs after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in agent permissioning that allows external side effects to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read agent permissioning that allows external side effects against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on procurement should fail a, then the evidence in agent permissioning that allows external side effects, then the action for AI committee secretariat - Hypothesis scorecard against agent permissioning that allows external side effects: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes procurement should fail a if a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is later withdrawn - Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others