Assess whether an RFP gap is correctable or a recompete risk (68a7ca)

Situation

After an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control, AI procurement evaluation that skipped bias testing is what OFAC sanctions investigator can touch in an IG shop scoping a whistleblower allegation. US Federal will live with An RFP gap is correctable versus A recompete risk on this Banking Regulation and Model Risk file.

Decision

OFAC sanctions investigator in an IG shop scoping a whistleblower allegation must choose An RFP gap is correctable / A recompete risk using AI procurement evaluation that skipped bias testing after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize An RFP gap is correctable now; AI procurement evaluation that skipped bias testing already has the discriminator after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control.
• Keep A recompete risk in force until AI procurement evaluation that skipped bias testing is completed after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control for OFAC sanctions investigator.
• Treat AI procurement evaluation that skipped bias testing as An RFP gap is correctable because both readings appear after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control.
• Refuse a US Federal close: OFAC sanctions investigator does not have the page an RFP gap is turns on in AI procurement evaluation that skipped bias testing.

Analysis required

• Map FAR, Section L/M, and evaluator priorities in AI procurement evaluation that skipped bias testing after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control.
• Name the evaluation right OFAC sanctions investigator would forfeit by rushing.
• Normalize pricing and CPARS/QASP evidence that actually supports an RFP gap is.
• For this US Federal Banking Regulation and Model Risk file, read AI procurement evaluation that skipped bias testing against an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control and write the one fact that would move an RFP gap is for OFAC sanctions investigator.

Recommendation

Choose An RFP gap is correctable / A recompete risk on this US Federal / Banking Regulation and Model Risk packet (AI procurement evaluation that skipped bias testing after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control). Lead with the US Federal option AI procurement evaluation that skipped bias testing can support after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for OFAC sanctions investigator in an IG shop scoping a whistleblower allegation.