Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (c4268f)

SITUATION After drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show, decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is what enterprise AI control-plane owner can touch in a hospital committee that never records dissent. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Enterprise AI control-plane owner can defend Policy or governance breach from decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. Enterprise AI control-plane owner cannot defend Policy or governance breach from decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 3. Drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show never reached the population in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step — reopen intake, do not close procurement should fail a. 4. Two facts in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show conflict for enterprise AI control-plane owner; hold this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a hospital committee that never records dissent. 3. Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate enterprise AI control-plane owner can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step can support after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for enterprise AI control-plane owner in a hospital committee that never records dissent.