Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (83d49c)

Situation

Past performance will score sits with capture manager because a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year hit an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance. Evidence is protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors; write the Government RFP Performance and Teaming option that extract can carry.

Decision

Capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.

Hypotheses to test

• Capture manager can defend Past performance will score from protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year in a Government RFP challenge.
• Capture manager cannot defend Past performance will score from protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors; Be deemed not relevant is what the extract actually supports after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• A data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year never reached the population in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors — reopen intake, do not close past performance will score.
• Two facts in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year conflict for capture manager; hold this Performance and Teaming file.

Analysis required

• Score competitive posture if capture manager pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance cannot waive quietly.
• Map Section L/M requirements in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors to evaluator notes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors against a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for capture manager.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year). Lead with the Government RFP option protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors can support after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.