Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (79b8f7)

Situation

After a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year, discriminator table that still reads generic is what capture manager can touch in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance. Government RFP will live with Past performance will score versus Be deemed not relevant on this Performance and Teaming file.

Decision

Capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using discriminator table that still reads generic after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.

Hypotheses to test

• Capture manager can defend Past performance will score from discriminator table that still reads generic after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year in a Government RFP challenge.
• Capture manager cannot defend Past performance will score from discriminator table that still reads generic; Be deemed not relevant is what the extract actually supports after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• A data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year never reached the population in discriminator table that still reads generic — reopen intake, do not close past performance will score.
• Two facts in discriminator table that still reads generic after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year conflict for capture manager; hold this Performance and Teaming file.

Analysis required

• Score competitive posture if capture manager pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance cannot waive quietly.
• Map Section L/M requirements in discriminator table that still reads generic to evaluator notes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read discriminator table that still reads generic against a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for capture manager.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (discriminator table that still reads generic after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year). The follow-on Performance and Teaming action is what capture manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.