Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive after a key

SITUATION Capture manager is responsible for the SBIR data-rights assertions in a joint venture, using an uneven workshare draft with shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps as the only working extract. A key person who just resigned is what reset the timeline for this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file.

DECISION Capture manager in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a key person who just resigned.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Pursue now; shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps already has the discriminator after a key person who just resigned. 2. Keep Pursue with conditions in force until shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is completed after a key person who just resigned for capture manager. 3. Treat shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps as Partner because both readings appear after a key person who just resigned. 4. Refuse a Government RFP close: capture manager does not have the decision the SBIR data-rights assertions turns on in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions. 2. Score competitive posture if capture manager pursues, partners, or no-bids. 3. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft cannot waive quietly. 4. For this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file, read shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for capture manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Capture and Pricing packet (shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a key person who just resigned). The follow-on Capture and Pricing action is what capture manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the SBIR data-rights assertions, then the evidence in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps, then the action for capture manager - Hypothesis scorecard against shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps: supported / rejected / untestable - Capture and Pricing finding in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps that a second reviewer can re-perform - Missing page in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a key person who just resigned, if any