Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (6bd3ca)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A lab competing a Phase II SBIR cannot treat an incumbent protest rumor on the street as color commentary on teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes. CMMC implementation lead must close past performance will score from that extract under Government RFP / Capture and Pricing.
Decision
CMMC implementation lead in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after an incumbent protest rumor on the street.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is the one an incumbent protest rumor on the street named, so Past performance will score follows for this Capture and Pricing file.
- The population in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is adjacent only to an incumbent protest rumor on the street; Be deemed not relevant is the honest Government RFP call.
- A lab competing a Phase II SBIR already contained an incumbent protest rumor on the street before teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes arrived; no new Capture and Pricing path.
- Provenance on teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after an incumbent protest rumor on the street is broken; do not pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant yet.
Analysis required
- Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a lab competing a Phase II SBIR cannot waive quietly.
- Map Section L/M requirements in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes to evaluator notes after an incumbent protest rumor on the street.
- Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes attaches.
- For this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file, read teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes against an incumbent protest rumor on the street and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for CMMC implementation lead.
Recommendation
Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Capture and Pricing packet (teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after an incumbent protest rumor on the street). The follow-on Capture and Pricing action is what CMMC implementation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More Government RFP prompts
- Assess whether claimed differentiators would survive a fact check (18bdba)
- Assess whether the teaming structure creates OCI or workshare risk (1f173a)
- Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid (4f6a7b)
- Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (d37c6a)
- Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid (e6808f)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

