Assess whether dealer overlays introduce prohibited steering (a29ac2)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
An institution preparing for a redlining exam cannot treat a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class as color commentary on mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group. Community-development lender must close dealer overlays introduce prohibited from that extract under Fair Lending / CRA and Special-Purpose Programs.
Decision
Community-development lender in an institution preparing for a redlining exam must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class.
Hypotheses to test
- Community-development lender can defend Remove access or reverse the item from mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class in a Fair Lending challenge.
- Community-development lender cannot defend Remove access or reverse the item from mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group; Temporary compensating control is what the extract actually supports after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class.
- A SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class never reached the population in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group — reopen intake, do not close dealer overlays introduce prohibited.
- Two facts in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class conflict for community-development lender; hold this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
Analysis required
- Flag any disparate-impact table community-development lender cannot explain from mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group.
- Test a documented exception versus a pattern an institution preparing for a redlining exam must defend.
- Match the adverse-action language to the facts in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group.
- For this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file, read mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group against a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class and write the one fact that would move dealer overlays introduce prohibited for community-development lender.
Recommendation
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether a model update needs a fair-lending revalidation (790ba0)
- Assess whether a redlining pattern exists after controls (1aca1b)
- Assess whether a redlining pattern exists after controls (e21a5d)
- Assess whether to pause a product pending a lookback (04a33a)
- Assess whether a redlining pattern exists after controls (2e55e5)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether umbrella attachment is too thin for the hazard (2e2892)Insurance Underwriting
- Assess whether the wire recall window is still open (9b4d5c)Fraud Detection
- Assess whether to freeze, monitor, or close the account (06615b)Fraud Detection
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

