Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (69c653)

SITUATION Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions has one working extract — content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy — after a committee that has not met since the last incident. If content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy cannot support the committee can overrule, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a committee that has not met since the last incident.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy already has the discriminator after a committee that has not met since the last incident. 2. Keep Model defect in force until content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy is completed after a committee that has not met since the last incident for multi-model reconciliation lead. 3. Treat content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy as Dual failure because both readings appear after a committee that has not met since the last incident. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: multi-model reconciliation lead does not have the decision the committee can overrule turns on in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 3. Map the control-plane score in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy to the policy gate multi-model reconciliation lead can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy against a committee that has not met since the last incident and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a committee that has not met since the last incident). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what multi-model reconciliation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.