Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (430efa)

SITUATION Audit and Vendor Terms work in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA now turns on vendor terms allow customer because a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice put content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy in play. Audit and Vendor Terms work in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA now turns on vendor terms allow customer because a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice put content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy in play; AI committee secretariat should say what content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy proves for AI Governance Layer.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy is the one a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Audit and Vendor Terms file. 2. The population in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy is adjacent only to a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA already contained a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice before content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy arrived; no new Audit and Vendor Terms path. 4. Provenance on content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 2. Map the control-plane score in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy can support after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA.