Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (30e933)

SITUATION Contracts officer supporting a bid is responsible for past performance will score in a joint venture, using an uneven workshare draft with small-business subcontracting plan short of goals as the only working extract. A key person who just resigned is what reset the timeline for this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file.

DECISION Contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using small-business subcontracting plan short of goals after a key person who just resigned.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in small-business subcontracting plan short of goals is the one a key person who just resigned named, so Past performance will score follows for this Compliance and Cyber Requirements file. 2. The population in small-business subcontracting plan short of goals is adjacent only to a key person who just resigned; Be deemed not relevant is the honest Government RFP call. 3. A joint venture with an uneven workshare draft already contained a key person who just resigned before small-business subcontracting plan short of goals arrived; no new Compliance and Cyber Requirements path. 4. Provenance on small-business subcontracting plan short of goals after a key person who just resigned is broken; do not pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score. 2. Score competitive posture if contracts officer supporting a bid pursues, partners, or no-bids. 3. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft cannot waive quietly. 4. For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read small-business subcontracting plan short of goals against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for contracts officer supporting a bid.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (small-business subcontracting plan short of goals after a key person who just resigned). The follow-on Compliance and Cyber Requirements action is what contracts officer supporting a bid does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on past performance will score, then the evidence in small-business subcontracting plan short of goals, then the action for contracts officer supporting a bid - Hypothesis scorecard against small-business subcontracting plan short of goals: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes past performance will score if a key person who just resigned is later withdrawn - Named option among Past performance will score, Be deemed not relevant and the fact that kills the others