Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (768fde)

SITUATION Multi-model disagreement log on production cases arrived with an agent that refunded customers above its limit for decision-audit designer. That is a AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring decision on the control plane actually in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using multi-model disagreement log on production cases after an agent that refunded customers above its limit.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Multi-model disagreement log on production cases reads as Policy or governance breach once an agent that refunded customers above its limit is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Multi-model disagreement log on production cases is closer to Model defect after an agent that refunded customers above its limit; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Control Plane and Scoring extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in multi-model disagreement log on production cases for decision-audit designer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights. 4. Multi-model disagreement log on production cases is missing the fact decision-audit designer needs after an agent that refunded customers above its limit; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in multi-model disagreement log on production cases to the policy gate decision-audit designer can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let the control plane actually proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether an agent that refunded customers above its limit changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read multi-model disagreement log on production cases against an agent that refunded customers above its limit and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (multi-model disagreement log on production cases after an agent that refunded customers above its limit). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what decision-audit designer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on the control plane actually, then the evidence in multi-model disagreement log on production cases, then the action for decision-audit designer - Hypothesis scorecard against multi-model disagreement log on production cases: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for decision-audit designer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights - What changes the control plane actually if an agent that refunded customers above its limit is later withdrawn