Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (62dcdb)

SITUATION Decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent has one working extract — agent permissioning that allows external side effects — after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. If agent permissioning that allows external side effects cannot support procurement should fail a, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using agent permissioning that allows external side effects after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Agent permissioning that allows external side effects reads as Policy or governance breach once drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Agent permissioning that allows external side effects is closer to Model defect after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Audit and Vendor Terms extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in agent permissioning that allows external side effects for decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent. 4. Agent permissioning that allows external side effects is missing the fact decision-audit designer needs after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a hospital committee that never records dissent. 2. Map the control-plane score in agent permissioning that allows external side effects to the policy gate decision-audit designer can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read agent permissioning that allows external side effects against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (agent permissioning that allows external side effects after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option agent permissioning that allows external side effects can support after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent.