Assess whether to recoup, waive, or refer for prosecution (7d6fd3)

SITUATION Disability continuing-eligibility reviewer is responsible for to recoup, waive, or refer in a disability unit facing a backlog of CDRs, using UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs as the only working extract. An identity-proofing vendor outage that opened a manual path is what reset the timeline for this Public Benefits Compliance and Integrity Operations file.

DECISION Disability continuing-eligibility reviewer in a disability unit facing a backlog of CDRs must choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution using UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after an identity-proofing vendor outage that opened a manual path.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs is the one an identity-proofing vendor outage that opened a manual path named, so To recoup, waive, follows for this Compliance and Integrity Operations file. 2. The population in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs is adjacent only to an identity-proofing vendor outage that opened a manual path; Refer for prosecution is the honest Public Benefits call. 3. A disability unit facing a backlog of CDRs already contained an identity-proofing vendor outage that opened a manual path before UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs arrived; no new Compliance and Integrity Operations path. 4. Provenance on UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after an identity-proofing vendor outage that opened a manual path is broken; do not pick To recoup, waive, or Refer for prosecution yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify overpayment if to recoup, waive, or refer is wrong. 2. Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a disability unit facing a backlog of CDRs. 3. Match household facts in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs to the rule that pays the benefit. 4. For this Public Benefits Compliance and Integrity Operations file, read UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs against an identity-proofing vendor outage that opened a manual path and write the one fact that would move to recoup, waive, or refer for disability continuing-eligibility reviewer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution on this Public Benefits / Compliance and Integrity Operations packet (UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after an identity-proofing vendor outage that opened a manual path). If UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs cannot force a Public Benefits label under Compliance and Integrity Operations, stop. If UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after an identity-proofing vendor outage that opened a manual path cannot support To recoup, waive, versus Refer for prosecution on this Public Benefits Compliance and Integrity Operations close, disability continuing-eligibility reviewer must do not pay, recoup, or deny beyond the eligibility record.