Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (11db7d)

Situation

Discriminator table that still reads generic arrived with a task order that looks written for one vendor for CMMC implementation lead. That is a Government RFP Capture and Pricing decision on past performance will score in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR.

Decision

CMMC implementation lead in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using discriminator table that still reads generic after a task order that looks written for one vendor.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Past performance will score now; discriminator table that still reads generic already has the discriminator after a task order that looks written for one vendor.
• Keep Be deemed not relevant in force until discriminator table that still reads generic is completed after a task order that looks written for one vendor for CMMC implementation lead.
• Treat discriminator table that still reads generic as Past performance will score because both readings appear after a task order that looks written for one vendor.
• Refuse a Government RFP close: CMMC implementation lead does not have the page past performance will score turns on in discriminator table that still reads generic.

Analysis required

• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what discriminator table that still reads generic attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• Score competitive posture if CMMC implementation lead pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• For this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file, read discriminator table that still reads generic against a task order that looks written for one vendor and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for CMMC implementation lead.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Capture and Pricing packet (discriminator table that still reads generic after a task order that looks written for one vendor). Lead with the Government RFP option discriminator table that still reads generic can support after a task order that looks written for one vendor, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for CMMC implementation lead in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR.