Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (b2ebc7)

SITUATION Exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model has one working extract — board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims — after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy. If board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims cannot support the hiring tool should, the only defensible AI Governance output is hold.

DECISION Exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims already has the discriminator after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy. 2. Keep Model defect in force until board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims is completed after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy for exam-readiness coordinator. 3. Treat board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims as Dual failure because both readings appear after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy. 4. Refuse a AI Governance close: exam-readiness coordinator does not have the decision the hiring tool should turns on in board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Walk the model input/output path recorded in board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 2. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate exam-readiness coordinator can actually point to. 3. Walk the model input/output path recorded in board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims against a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for exam-readiness coordinator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy). If board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims cannot force a AI Governance label under Policy and Oversight, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the hiring tool should, then the evidence in board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims, then the action for exam-readiness coordinator - Hypothesis scorecard against board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in board literacy briefing deck with overstated claims after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Policy and Oversight would cite