Assess whether the site should be suspended from collections (b21f47)

SITUATION In a company transitioning to oral fluid, hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision is the evidence after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff. Medical review officer has to pick Accept the result or Reject on custody for this Forensic Drug Testing Program Design and Audit close using hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision.

DECISION Medical review officer in a company transitioning to oral fluid must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. An oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is noise around an already-controlled Program Design and Audit process in a company transitioning to oral fluid, given hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision. 2. An oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is the event in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision that forces Accept the result for medical review officer under Forensic Drug Testing. 3. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision shows a one-file miss after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff, not a Program Design and Audit program failure. 4. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision cannot decide the site should be suspended yet after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff; hold is the only Forensic Drug Testing close a company transitioning to oral fluid can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the step medical review officer cannot reconstruct from hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision. 2. Test whether a broken seal, timing miss, or donor explanation changes the site should be suspended. 3. Confirm the kit ID in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision matches the collection log. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Program Design and Audit file, read hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision against an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff and write the one fact that would move the site should be suspended for medical review officer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Program Design and Audit packet (hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff). Lead with the Forensic Drug Testing option hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision can support after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for medical review officer in a company transitioning to oral fluid.