Assess whether dealer overlays introduce prohibited steering (3137cb)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
After a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time, SPCP written plan versus actual originations is what HMDA data-quality manager can touch in a credit union rolling out a special-purpose credit program. Fair Lending will live with Remove access or reverse the item versus Temporary compensating control on this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
Decision
HMDA data-quality manager in a credit union rolling out a special-purpose credit program must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in SPCP written plan versus actual originations is the one a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time named, so Remove access or reverse the item follows for this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
- The population in SPCP written plan versus actual originations is adjacent only to a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time; Temporary compensating control is the honest Fair Lending call.
- A credit union rolling out a special-purpose credit program already contained a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time before SPCP written plan versus actual originations arrived; no new CRA and Special-Purpose Programs path.
- Provenance on SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time is broken; do not pick Remove access or reverse the item or Temporary compensating control yet.
Analysis required
- Check HMDA coding and underwriting policy against dealer overlays introduce prohibited.
- Compare SPCP written plan versus actual originations to similarly situated files, second-review notes, and reason codes after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time.
- Flag any disparate-impact table HMDA data-quality manager cannot explain from SPCP written plan versus actual originations.
- For this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file, read SPCP written plan versus actual originations against a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time and write the one fact that would move dealer overlays introduce prohibited for HMDA data-quality manager.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether dealer overlays introduce prohibited steering (20b94b)
- Assess whether the exam response should concede a finding (937b21)
- Assess whether a redlining pattern exists after controls (887683)
- Assess whether a model update needs a fair-lending revalidation (c5902f)
- Assess whether a special-purpose program is well designed or a pretext
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

