Assess whether to brief the legislature with a number that will survive audit

SITUATION After a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE, UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs is what housing-subsidy fraud investigator can touch in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households. Public Benefits will live with Pay or continue versus Recoup on this Recoupment and Policy file.

DECISION Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Pay or continue now; UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs already has the discriminator after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE. 2. Keep Recoup in force until UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs is completed after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE for housing-subsidy fraud investigator. 3. Treat UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs as Deny because both readings appear after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE. 4. Refuse a Public Benefits close: housing-subsidy fraud investigator does not have the decision to brief the legislature turns on in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify overpayment if to brief the legislature is wrong. 2. Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households. 3. Match household facts in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs to the rule that pays the benefit. 4. For this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file, read UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs against a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE and write the one fact that would move to brief the legislature for housing-subsidy fraud investigator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold on this Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy packet (UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE). The follow-on Recoupment and Policy action is what housing-subsidy fraud investigator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Public Benefits option on to brief the legislature, then the evidence in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs, then the action for housing-subsidy fraud investigator - Hypothesis scorecard against UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households - What changes to brief the legislature if a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE is later withdrawn