Assess whether continuing disability review supports cessation (fe38ba)

SITUATION UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs arrived with a recoupment that would make a household homeless for housing-subsidy fraud investigator. That is a Public Benefits Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud decision on continuing disability review supports in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike.

DECISION Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after a recoupment that would make a household homeless.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs is the one a recoupment that would make a household homeless named, so Pay or continue follows for this Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud file. 2. The population in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs is adjacent only to a recoupment that would make a household homeless; Recoup is the honest Public Benefits call. 3. A UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike already contained a recoupment that would make a household homeless before UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs arrived; no new Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud path. 4. Provenance on UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after a recoupment that would make a household homeless is broken; do not pick Pay or continue or Recoup yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test eligibility, recoupment, and improper-payment facts in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after a recoupment that would make a household homeless. 2. Quantify overpayment if continuing disability review supports is wrong. 3. Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike. 4. For this Public Benefits Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud file, read UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs against a recoupment that would make a household homeless and write the one fact that would move continuing disability review supports for housing-subsidy fraud investigator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold on this Public Benefits / Trafficking and Eligibility Fraud packet (UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after a recoupment that would make a household homeless). Lead with the Public Benefits option UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs can support after a recoupment that would make a household homeless, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Public Benefits option on continuing disability review supports, then the evidence in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs, then the action for housing-subsidy fraud investigator - Hypothesis scorecard against UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Pay or continue, Recoup, Deny and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike