Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
In a bank preparing for a model-risk exam, EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is the evidence after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy. HR analytics governance lead has to pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Policy and Oversight close using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
Decision
HR analytics governance lead in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy.
Hypotheses to test
- HR analytics governance lead can defend Policy or governance breach from EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy in a AI Governance challenge.
- HR analytics governance lead cannot defend Policy or governance breach from EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy.
- A customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy never reached the population in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet — reopen intake, do not close deprecation of a legacy.
- Two facts in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy conflict for HR analytics governance lead; hold this Policy and Oversight file.
Analysis required
- Reproduce the incident row in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and say whether it ever touched production data.
- Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
- Reproduce the incident row in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and say whether it ever touched production data.
- For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy and write the one fact that would move deprecation of a legacy for HR analytics governance lead.
Recommendation
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap
- Assess whether the board has been accurately briefed (bdfc68)
- Assess whether a generative-AI incident is a policy breach or a model defect
- Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (9bbef3)
- Assess whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process (4af2f6)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

