Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (343db5)

SITUATION Control Plane and Scoring work in a hospital committee that never records dissent now turns on procurement should fail a because a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice put output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output in play. Model-deprecation manager should say what output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output proves.

DECISION Model-deprecation manager in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output reads as Policy or governance breach once a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is closer to Model defect after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Control Plane and Scoring extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output for model-deprecation manager in a hospital committee that never records dissent. 4. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is missing the fact model-deprecation manager needs after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate model-deprecation manager can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for model-deprecation manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what model-deprecation manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on procurement should fail a, then the evidence in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output, then the action for model-deprecation manager - Hypothesis scorecard against output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for model-deprecation manager in a hospital committee that never records dissent