Assess whether notices match the actual decisioning reasons (22130c)
August 31, 2026
SITUATION Examination and Notices work in a manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files now turns on notices match the actual because a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class put mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group in play. Community-development lender should say what mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group proves.
DECISION Community-development lender in a manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Community-development lender can defend Remove access or reverse the item from mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class in a Fair Lending challenge. 2. Community-development lender cannot defend Remove access or reverse the item from mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group; Temporary compensating control is what the extract actually supports after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class. 3. A SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class never reached the population in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group — reopen intake, do not close notices match the actual. 4. Two facts in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class conflict for community-development lender; hold this Examination and Notices file.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Match the adverse-action language to the facts in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group. 2. Check HMDA coding and underwriting policy against notices match the actual. 3. Compare mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group to similarly situated files, second-review notes, and reason codes after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class. 4. For this Fair Lending Examination and Notices file, read mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group against a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class and write the one fact that would move notices match the actual for community-development lender.
RECOMMENDATION Choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold on this Fair Lending / Examination and Notices packet (mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class). If mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group cannot force a Fair Lending label under Examination and Notices, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files does not have.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether comparative files show second-review bias (e9b82d)
- Assess whether HMDA data can be relied on for the exam (4a338d)
- Assess whether a redlining pattern exists after controls (462361)
- Assess whether notices match the actual decisioning reasons (474009)
- Assess whether a redlining pattern exists after controls (0d05c1)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

