Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (a496af)

SITUATION An agent that refunded customers above its limit put committee charter that does not define escalation in front of multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. This AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability close is procurement should fail a from committee charter that does not define escalation, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using committee charter that does not define escalation after an agent that refunded customers above its limit.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in committee charter that does not define escalation is the one an agent that refunded customers above its limit named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Lifecycle and Accountability file. 2. The population in committee charter that does not define escalation is adjacent only to an agent that refunded customers above its limit; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions already contained an agent that refunded customers above its limit before committee charter that does not define escalation arrived; no new Lifecycle and Accountability path. 4. Provenance on committee charter that does not define escalation after an agent that refunded customers above its limit is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 2. Map the control-plane score in committee charter that does not define escalation to the policy gate multi-model reconciliation lead can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read committee charter that does not define escalation against an agent that refunded customers above its limit and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (committee charter that does not define escalation after an agent that refunded customers above its limit). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what multi-model reconciliation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.