Assess whether agents must have a human gate for external actions (490c11)

Situation

Agents must have a human gate sits with multi-model reconciliation lead because a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure hit an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor. Evidence is agent permissioning that allows external side effects; write the AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms option that extract can carry.

Decision

Multi-model reconciliation lead in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Policy or governance breach now; agent permissioning that allows external side effects already has the discriminator after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.
• Keep Model defect in force until agent permissioning that allows external side effects is completed after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure for multi-model reconciliation lead.
• Treat agent permissioning that allows external side effects as Dual failure because both readings appear after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.
• Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: multi-model reconciliation lead does not have the page agents must have a human gate turns on in agent permissioning that allows external side effects.

Analysis required

• Test whether a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• Score whether the agent action in agent permissioning that allows external side effects was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged.
• Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor.
• For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read agent permissioning that allows external side effects against a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure and write the one fact that would move agents must have a human gate for multi-model reconciliation lead.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what multi-model reconciliation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.