Assess whether monitoring detects drift or only outages (5adffc)

SITUATION An enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor cannot treat an agent that refunded customers above its limit as incidental context on post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime. Multi-model reconciliation lead must close monitoring detects drift or from that extract under AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor must choose Monitoring detects drift / Only outages using post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after an agent that refunded customers above its limit.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime reads as Monitoring detects drift once an agent that refunded customers above its limit is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime is closer to Only outages after an agent that refunded customers above its limit; Monitoring detects drift would over-claim this Audit and Vendor Terms extract. 3. A dual reading is still live in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime for multi-model reconciliation lead in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor. 4. Post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime is missing the fact multi-model reconciliation lead needs after an agent that refunded customers above its limit; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let monitoring detects drift or proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether an agent that refunded customers above its limit changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime against an agent that refunded customers above its limit and write the one fact that would move monitoring detects drift or for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Monitoring detects drift / Only outages on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after an agent that refunded customers above its limit). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what multi-model reconciliation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on monitoring detects drift or, then the evidence in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime, then the action for multi-model reconciliation lead - Hypothesis scorecard against post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Monitoring detects drift, Only outages and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for multi-model reconciliation lead in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor