Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (99daf2)

SITUATION Post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime arrived with a committee that has not met since the last incident. Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions still has an evidence gap on whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after a committee that has not met since the last incident.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime is the one a committee that has not met since the last incident named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Lifecycle and Accountability file. 2. The population in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime is adjacent only to a committee that has not met since the last incident; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions already contained a committee that has not met since the last incident before post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime arrived; no new Lifecycle and Accountability path. 4. Provenance on post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after a committee that has not met since the last incident is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a committee that has not met since the last incident changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime against a committee that has not met since the last incident and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after a committee that has not met since the last incident). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime can support after a committee that has not met since the last incident, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions.