Assess whether unpriced actions should be stopped (e39e42)

SITUATION A workload that shifted from organic repair to contract cannot treat UCAs older than the local policy cap as incidental context on depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers. Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst must close unpriced actions should be stopped from that extract under Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence.

DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers after UCAs older than the local policy cap.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers is the one UCAs older than the local policy cap named, so Fund and move materiel follows for this Depot Procurement Intelligence file. 2. The population in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers is adjacent only to UCAs older than the local policy cap; Cannibalize or substitute is the honest Defense Sustainment call. 3. A workload that shifted from organic repair to contract already contained UCAs older than the local policy cap before depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers arrived; no new Depot Procurement Intelligence path. 4. Provenance on depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers after UCAs older than the local policy cap is broken; do not pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers. 2. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 3. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers against UCAs older than the local policy cap and write the one fact that would move unpriced actions should be stopped for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.

RECOMMENDATION A workload that shifted from organic repair to contract needs a named owner on unpriced actions should be stopped. Assign obsolescence and DMSMS analyst to execute Fund and move materiel when depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers after UCAs older than the local policy cap is complete, or Cannibalize or substitute when the Depot Procurement Intelligence packet still lacks the discriminator in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on unpriced actions should be stopped, then the evidence in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers, then the action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Fund and move materiel, Cannibalize or substitute, Defer a cycle and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract