Assess whether unpriced actions should be stopped (9a9964)

SITUATION A workload that shifted from organic repair to contract cannot treat a TDP that is marked incomplete but still on contract as incidental context on depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers. Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst must close unpriced actions should be stopped from that extract under Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence.

DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers after a TDP that is marked incomplete but still on contract.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Fund and move materiel now; depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers already has the discriminator after a TDP that is marked incomplete but still on contract. 2. Keep Cannibalize or substitute in force until depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers is completed after a TDP that is marked incomplete but still on contract for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst. 3. Treat depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers as Defer a cycle because both readings appear after a TDP that is marked incomplete but still on contract. 4. Refuse a Defense Sustainment close: obsolescence and DMSMS analyst does not have the decision unpriced actions should be stopped turns on in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 2. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers. 3. Quantify mission impact if unpriced actions should be stopped is deferred one cycle in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers against a TDP that is marked incomplete but still on contract and write the one fact that would move unpriced actions should be stopped for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers after a TDP that is marked incomplete but still on contract). The follow-on Depot Procurement Intelligence action is what obsolescence and DMSMS analyst does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on unpriced actions should be stopped, then the evidence in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers, then the action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers: supported / rejected / untestable - Depot Procurement Intelligence finding in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers that a second reviewer can re-perform - Missing page in depot transaction file with duplicate document numbers after a TDP that is marked incomplete but still on contract, if any