Assess whether a split request was handled inside required time (187fbe)

Situation

After a donor claiming the seal was already broken, prescription that could explain an opioid positive is what oral-fluid implementation lead can touch in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive. Forensic Drug Testing will live with Accept the result versus Reject on custody on this Specimen Validity file.

Decision

Oral-fluid implementation lead in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using prescription that could explain an opioid positive after a donor claiming the seal was already broken.

Hypotheses to test

• A donor claiming the seal was already broken is noise around an already-controlled Specimen Validity process in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive, given prescription that could explain an opioid positive.
• A donor claiming the seal was already broken is the event in prescription that could explain an opioid positive that forces Accept the result for oral-fluid implementation lead under Forensic Drug Testing.
• Prescription that could explain an opioid positive shows a one-file miss after a donor claiming the seal was already broken, not a Specimen Validity program failure.
• Prescription that could explain an opioid positive cannot decide a split request was yet after a donor claiming the seal was already broken; hold is the only Forensic Drug Testing close an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive can defend.

Analysis required

• Confirm the kit ID in prescription that could explain an opioid positive matches the collection log.
• Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive claims to run.
• Walk chain of custody, collection site, and validity flags in prescription that could explain an opioid positive after a donor claiming the seal was already broken.
• For this Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity file, read prescription that could explain an opioid positive against a donor claiming the seal was already broken and write the one fact that would move a split request was for oral-fluid implementation lead.

Recommendation

Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Specimen Validity packet (prescription that could explain an opioid positive after a donor claiming the seal was already broken). Lead with the Forensic Drug Testing option prescription that could explain an opioid positive can support after a donor claiming the seal was already broken, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for oral-fluid implementation lead in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive.