Assess whether audits can reconstruct who authorized what (9743f1)

Situation

Audits can reconstruct who sits with AI committee secretariat because a committee that has not met since the last incident hit a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. Evidence is output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output; write the AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability option that extract can carry.

Decision

AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a committee that has not met since the last incident.

Hypotheses to test

• Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output reads as Policy or governance breach once a committee that has not met since the last incident is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population.
• Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is closer to Model defect after a committee that has not met since the last incident; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract.
• Dual failure is still live in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.
• Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is missing the fact AI committee secretariat needs after a committee that has not met since the last incident; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

Analysis required

• Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce.
• Name the override that would let audits can reconstruct who proceed without a silent bypass.
• Test whether a committee that has not met since the last incident changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a committee that has not met since the last incident and write the one fact that would move audits can reconstruct who for AI committee secretariat.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a committee that has not met since the last incident). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.