Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (271d06)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
In an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance, past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is the only Performance and Teaming extract after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement that capture manager can use for past performance will score. Capture manager has to pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant for this Government RFP Performance and Teaming close using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard.
Decision
Capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.
Hypotheses to test
- Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard reads as Past performance will score once a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement is lined up to the same Government RFP population.
- Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is closer to Be deemed not relevant after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement; Past performance will score would over-claim this Performance and Teaming extract.
- A dual reading is still live in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard for capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.
- Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is missing the fact capture manager needs after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement; stop this Government RFP close.
Analysis required
- Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches.
- Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
- Score competitive posture if capture manager pursues, partners, or no-bids.
- For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for capture manager.
Recommendation
Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement). The follow-on Performance and Teaming action is what capture manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More Government RFP prompts
- Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (24274e)
- Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid (e16c44)
- Assess whether a modification is in-scope or a new procurement (79e866)
- Assess whether key personnel substitutions will trigger evaluation risk
- Assess whether to price to win or walk from a buy-in (75ce2c)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

