Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (bd70b6)

Situation

Past-performance volume owner owns past performance will score inside a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft with past-performance recency and relevance scorecard as the only packet. A key person who just resigned is what changed the clock for this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file.

Decision

Past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is the one a key person who just resigned named, so Past performance will score follows for this Performance and Teaming file.
• The population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is adjacent only to a key person who just resigned; Be deemed not relevant is the honest Government RFP call.
• A joint venture with an uneven workshare draft already contained a key person who just resigned before past-performance recency and relevance scorecard arrived; no new Performance and Teaming path.
• Provenance on past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned is broken; do not pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant yet.

Analysis required

• Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a key person who just resigned.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for past-performance volume owner.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned). Lead with the Government RFP option past-performance recency and relevance scorecard can support after a key person who just resigned, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft.