Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (217adc)

SITUATION A retailer using generative AI in customer service cannot treat a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' as incidental context on post-deployment drift report the owner never signed. Chief AI officer must close the hiring tool should from that extract under AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems.

DECISION Chief AI officer in a retailer using generative AI in customer service must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is the one a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Vendors and Agentic Systems file. 2. The population in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is adjacent only to a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call. 3. A retailer using generative AI in customer service already contained a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' before post-deployment drift report the owner never signed arrived; no new Vendors and Agentic Systems path. 4. Provenance on post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Walk the model input/output path recorded in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 2. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate chief AI officer can actually point to. 3. Walk the model input/output path recorded in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read post-deployment drift report the owner never signed against a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for chief AI officer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'). If post-deployment drift report the owner never signed cannot force a AI Governance label under Vendors and Agentic Systems, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a retailer using generative AI in customer service does not have.