Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (4ddfc7)

SITUATION Committee charter that does not define escalation arrived with a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure for post-deployment monitoring owner. That is a AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms decision on procurement should fail a in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.

DECISION Post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using committee charter that does not define escalation after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; committee charter that does not define escalation already has the discriminator after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure. 2. Keep Model defect in force until committee charter that does not define escalation is completed after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure for post-deployment monitoring owner. 3. Treat committee charter that does not define escalation as Dual failure because both readings appear after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: post-deployment monitoring owner does not have the decision procurement should fail a turns on in committee charter that does not define escalation.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in committee charter that does not define escalation was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read committee charter that does not define escalation against a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for post-deployment monitoring owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (committee charter that does not define escalation after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option committee charter that does not define escalation can support after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on procurement should fail a, then the evidence in committee charter that does not define escalation, then the action for post-deployment monitoring owner - Hypothesis scorecard against committee charter that does not define escalation: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in committee charter that does not define escalation after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Audit and Vendor Terms would cite