Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (1a13fe)

SITUATION A manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA cannot treat a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' as incidental context on content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy. Post-deployment monitoring owner must close procurement should fail a from that extract under AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring.

DECISION Post-deployment monitoring owner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy already has the discriminator after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 2. Keep Model defect in force until content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy is completed after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' for post-deployment monitoring owner. 3. Treat content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy as Dual failure because both readings appear after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: post-deployment monitoring owner does not have the decision procurement should fail a turns on in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 2. Score whether the agent action in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 3. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy against a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for post-deployment monitoring owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what post-deployment monitoring owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on procurement should fail a, then the evidence in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy, then the action for post-deployment monitoring owner - Hypothesis scorecard against content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for post-deployment monitoring owner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA