Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (b567a7)

SITUATION The working file is procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint. Post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy has to name Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file.

DECISION Post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A batch job still calling a retired endpoint is noise around an already-controlled Audit and Vendor Terms process in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy, given procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets. 2. A batch job still calling a retired endpoint is the event in procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets that forces Policy or governance breach for post-deployment monitoring owner under AI Governance Layer. 3. Procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets shows a one-file miss after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint, not a Audit and Vendor Terms program failure. 4. Procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets cannot decide procurement should fail a yet after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a publisher needing provenance on generated copy can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets to the policy gate post-deployment monitoring owner can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a batch job still calling a retired endpoint changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets against a batch job still calling a retired endpoint and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for post-deployment monitoring owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets can support after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.