Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (77f90b)

Situation

Past performance will score sits with proposal compliance lead because a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement hit an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP. Evidence is discriminator table that still reads generic; write the Government RFP Capture and Pricing option that extract can carry.

Decision

Proposal compliance lead in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using discriminator table that still reads generic after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.

Hypotheses to test

• Discriminator table that still reads generic reads as Past performance will score once a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement is lined up to the same Government RFP population.
• Discriminator table that still reads generic is closer to Be deemed not relevant after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement; Past performance will score would over-claim this Capture and Pricing extract.
• A dual reading is still live in discriminator table that still reads generic for proposal compliance lead in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP.
• Discriminator table that still reads generic is missing the fact proposal compliance lead needs after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement; stop this Government RFP close.

Analysis required

• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what discriminator table that still reads generic attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• Score competitive posture if proposal compliance lead pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• For this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file, read discriminator table that still reads generic against a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for proposal compliance lead.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Capture and Pricing packet (discriminator table that still reads generic after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement). Lead with the Government RFP option discriminator table that still reads generic can support after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for proposal compliance lead in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP.