Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (07337d)

Situation

After a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year, past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is what proposal compliance lead can touch in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work. Government RFP will live with Past performance will score versus Be deemed not relevant on this Performance and Teaming file.

Decision

Proposal compliance lead in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.

Hypotheses to test

• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard reads as Past performance will score once a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year is lined up to the same Government RFP population.
• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is closer to Be deemed not relevant after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year; Past performance will score would over-claim this Performance and Teaming extract.
• A dual reading is still live in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard for proposal compliance lead in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work.
• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is missing the fact proposal compliance lead needs after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year; stop this Government RFP close.

Analysis required

• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work cannot waive quietly.
• Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for proposal compliance lead.

Recommendation