Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (ec76a1)

SITUATION In a new prime parsing a 400-page Section L/M, past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is the evidence after a 14-day proposal clock after a late amendment. Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart has to pick Pursue or Pursue with conditions for this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements close using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard.

DECISION Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart in a new prime parsing a 400-page Section L/M must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a 14-day proposal clock after a late amendment.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Pursue now; past-performance recency and relevance scorecard already has the discriminator after a 14-day proposal clock after a late amendment. 2. Keep Pursue with conditions in force until past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is completed after a 14-day proposal clock after a late amendment for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart. 3. Treat past-performance recency and relevance scorecard as Partner because both readings appear after a 14-day proposal clock after a late amendment. 4. Refuse a Government RFP close: protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart does not have the decision the SBIR data-rights assertions turns on in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a 14-day proposal clock after a late amendment. 2. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches. 3. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions. 4. For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a 14-day proposal clock after a late amendment and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a 14-day proposal clock after a late amendment). The follow-on Compliance and Cyber Requirements action is what protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the SBIR data-rights assertions, then the evidence in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard, then the action for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart - Hypothesis scorecard against past-performance recency and relevance scorecard: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes the SBIR data-rights assertions if a 14-day proposal clock after a late amendment is later withdrawn - Named option among Pursue, Pursue with conditions, Partner and the fact that kills the others