Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (5daed5)

SITUATION An incumbent protest rumor on the street put shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps in front of capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance. This Government RFP / Performance and Teaming decision is the SBIR data-rights assertions from shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps, and the live options are Pursue, Pursue with conditions, Partner.

DECISION Capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after an incumbent protest rumor on the street.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Capture manager can defend Pursue from shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after an incumbent protest rumor on the street in a Government RFP challenge. 2. Capture manager cannot defend Pursue from shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps; Pursue with conditions is what the extract actually supports after an incumbent protest rumor on the street. 3. An incumbent protest rumor on the street never reached the population in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps — reopen intake, do not close the SBIR data-rights assertions. 4. Two facts in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after an incumbent protest rumor on the street conflict for capture manager; hold this Performance and Teaming file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map Section L/M requirements in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps to evaluator notes after an incumbent protest rumor on the street. 2. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps attaches. 3. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions. 4. For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps against an incumbent protest rumor on the street and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for capture manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after an incumbent protest rumor on the street). Lead with the Government RFP option shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps can support after an incumbent protest rumor on the street, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the SBIR data-rights assertions, then the evidence in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps, then the action for capture manager - Hypothesis scorecard against shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance - What changes the SBIR data-rights assertions if an incumbent protest rumor on the street is later withdrawn