Assess whether dealer overlays introduce prohibited steering (d94273)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class put SPCP written plan versus actual originations in front of second-review underwriter in a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts. This Fair Lending / CRA and Special-Purpose Programs close is dealer overlays introduce prohibited from SPCP written plan versus actual originations, and the live options are Remove access or reverse the item, Temporary compensating control, Approve a documented exception.
Decision
Second-review underwriter in a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class.
Hypotheses to test
- Second-review underwriter can defend Remove access or reverse the item from SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class in a Fair Lending challenge.
- Second-review underwriter cannot defend Remove access or reverse the item from SPCP written plan versus actual originations; Temporary compensating control is what the extract actually supports after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class.
- A SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class never reached the population in SPCP written plan versus actual originations — reopen intake, do not close dealer overlays introduce prohibited.
- Two facts in SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class conflict for second-review underwriter; hold this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
Analysis required
- Flag any disparate-impact table second-review underwriter cannot explain from SPCP written plan versus actual originations.
- Test a documented exception versus a pattern a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts must defend.
- Match the adverse-action language to the facts in SPCP written plan versus actual originations.
- For this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file, read SPCP written plan versus actual originations against a SPCP that originated almost no loans to the intended class and write the one fact that would move dealer overlays introduce prohibited for second-review underwriter.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether a special-purpose program is well designed or a pretext
- Assess whether to pause a product pending a lookback (f94acd)
- Assess whether comparative files show second-review bias (97e324)
- Assess whether comparative files show second-review bias (972735)
- Assess whether a model update needs a fair-lending revalidation (3344ea)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

