Assess whether a model update needs a fair-lending revalidation (905773)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
The desk packet is SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a HMDA resubmission that still fails quality edits. Second-review underwriter in a small-business desk using a new vendor score has to name Remove access or reverse the item or Temporary compensating control for this Fair Lending Redlining and HMDA Data file.
Decision
Second-review underwriter in a small-business desk using a new vendor score must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a HMDA resubmission that still fails quality edits.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Remove access or reverse the item now; SPCP written plan versus actual originations already has the discriminator after a HMDA resubmission that still fails quality edits.
- Keep Temporary compensating control in force until SPCP written plan versus actual originations is completed after a HMDA resubmission that still fails quality edits for second-review underwriter.
- Treat SPCP written plan versus actual originations as Approve a documented exception because both readings appear after a HMDA resubmission that still fails quality edits.
- Refuse a Fair Lending close: second-review underwriter does not have the page a model update needs turns on in SPCP written plan versus actual originations.
Analysis required
- Check HMDA coding and underwriting policy against a model update needs.
- Compare SPCP written plan versus actual originations to similarly situated files, second-review notes, and reason codes after a HMDA resubmission that still fails quality edits.
- Flag any disparate-impact table second-review underwriter cannot explain from SPCP written plan versus actual originations.
- For this Fair Lending Redlining and HMDA Data file, read SPCP written plan versus actual originations against a HMDA resubmission that still fails quality edits and write the one fact that would move a model update needs for second-review underwriter.
Recommendation
Choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold on this Fair Lending / Redlining and HMDA Data packet (SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a HMDA resubmission that still fails quality edits). Lead with the Fair Lending option SPCP written plan versus actual originations can support after a HMDA resubmission that still fails quality edits, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for second-review underwriter in a small-business desk using a new vendor score.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether a model update needs a fair-lending revalidation (601a28)
- Assess whether the CRA plan is strategy or window dressing after a vendor
- Assess whether notices match the actual decisioning reasons (5ca878)
- Assess whether HMDA data can be relied on for the exam (2f2362)
- Assess whether to pause a product pending a lookback (7e1d7a)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether loss development requires a rate or a restriction from D&OInsurance Underwriting
- Assess whether to quote, refer, or decline (8c97ea)Insurance Underwriting
- Assess whether occupancy was misrepresented at origination after a titleFraud Detection
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

