Assess whether identity proofing exceptions are being abused (505b47)

SITUATION In a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike, housing overlapping-address and income file is the evidence after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE. UI identity-fraud caseworker has to pick Pay or continue or Recoup for this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy close using housing overlapping-address and income file.

DECISION UI identity-fraud caseworker in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using housing overlapping-address and income file after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Housing overlapping-address and income file reads as Pay or continue once a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE is lined up to the same Public Benefits population. 2. Housing overlapping-address and income file is closer to Recoup after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE; Pay or continue would over-claim this Recoupment and Policy extract. 3. Deny is still live in housing overlapping-address and income file for UI identity-fraud caseworker in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike. 4. Housing overlapping-address and income file is missing the fact UI identity-fraud caseworker needs after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE; stop this Public Benefits close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Trace the notice and appeal path UI identity-fraud caseworker must preserve. 2. Test eligibility, recoupment, and improper-payment facts in housing overlapping-address and income file after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE. 3. Quantify overpayment if identity proofing exceptions are is wrong. 4. For this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file, read housing overlapping-address and income file against a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE and write the one fact that would move identity proofing exceptions are for UI identity-fraud caseworker.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold on this Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy packet (housing overlapping-address and income file after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE). If housing overlapping-address and income file cannot force a Public Benefits label under Recoupment and Policy, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Public Benefits option on identity proofing exceptions are, then the evidence in housing overlapping-address and income file, then the action for UI identity-fraud caseworker - Hypothesis scorecard against housing overlapping-address and income file: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for UI identity-fraud caseworker in a UI shop after a synthetic-identity filing spike - What changes identity proofing exceptions are if a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE is later withdrawn