Assess whether a cancelled spec is still being bought as if current (94ab7e)
August 31, 2026
SITUATION NSN research lead owns this Depot Procurement Intelligence review in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA. Buys against a cancelled spec still in the parts master is the triggering event; unpriced contractual action aging list is the evidence for whether a cancelled spec is still being bought as if current.
DECISION NSN research lead in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using unpriced contractual action aging list after buys against a cancelled spec still in the parts master.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Unpriced contractual action aging list reads as Fund and move materiel once buys against a cancelled spec still in the parts master is lined up to the same Defense Sustainment population. 2. Unpriced contractual action aging list is closer to Cannibalize or substitute after buys against a cancelled spec still in the parts master; Fund and move materiel would over-claim this Depot Procurement Intelligence extract. 3. Defer a cycle is still live in unpriced contractual action aging list for NSN research lead in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA. 4. Unpriced contractual action aging list is missing the fact NSN research lead needs after buys against a cancelled spec still in the parts master; stop this Defense Sustainment close.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move unpriced contractual action aging list. 2. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 3. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in unpriced contractual action aging list. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read unpriced contractual action aging list against buys against a cancelled spec still in the parts master and write the one fact that would move a cancelled spec is for NSN research lead.
RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (unpriced contractual action aging list after buys against a cancelled spec still in the parts master). Lead with the Defense Sustainment option unpriced contractual action aging list can support after buys against a cancelled spec still in the parts master, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for NSN research lead in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA.
COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on a cancelled spec is, then the evidence in unpriced contractual action aging list, then the action for NSN research lead - Hypothesis scorecard against unpriced contractual action aging list: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite - Depot Procurement Intelligence finding in unpriced contractual action aging list that a second reviewer can re-perform
Explore more
More Defense Sustainment prompts
- Assess whether condemnation rates imply a quality escape from DMSMS alert vs
- Assess whether condemnation rates imply a quality escape (a53653)
- Whether lead time is supplier, depot, or data-quality from contract vehicle
- Assess whether TDP is complete enough to compete the work (da07a9)
- Assess whether a cancelled spec is still being bought as if current (e3f577)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

